free bootstrap templates

Information for Authors

The Editorial Process 

A manuscript will be reviewed for possible publication with the understanding that it is being submitted to the Journal of Experimental Biology and Zoological Studies (EBIOZ) alone at that point of time and it has not been published anywhere, simultaneously submitted, or already accepted for publication elsewhere. The journal expects that authors would authorize one of them to correspond with the Journal for all matters related to the manuscript. The Journal will correspond only with the corresponding author and not with any co-authors. All manuscripts received are duly acknowledged. On submission, the manuscripts are first checked for plagiarism. Only in cases of minor duplication or similarity with previous published work, the authors may be provided an opportunity to rectify the same; in all other cases, the manuscript will be desk rejected informing the percentage of similarity index. All other manuscripts are subjected to a comprehensive screening by the Editorial Team to check their adherence to reporting guidelines and robustness in rationale and methodology. Manuscripts with major scientific or technical flaws and/or lack of a significant message are rejected at this stage along with manuscripts that are unlikely to be of interest to the EBIOZ readers. If a manuscript that passes the initial editorial screening is not in the format of EBIOZ, it will be returned to the corresponding author for technical modifications to make amendments. In such cases, only manuscripts in which satisfactory changes are made would be considered for further phases.

Manuscripts that are selected by the Editorial Team are sent to two or more expert reviewers. The Editorial Team/Board members who are authors are excluded from all publication processes and decisions of such manuscripts. During submission, it is mandatory for the contributor to provide names of two or three qualified reviewers who have/had experience in the subject of the submitted manuscript. The reviewers should not be affiliated with the same institutes as the contributor/s. However, the selection of these reviewers is at the sole discretion of the Editorial Team. The journal follows a double-blind review process where both reviewers and authors remain anonymous throughout the review process.

The Editor-in-Chief, based on the comments and recommendations of reviewers, takes a final decision on the manuscript. The comments and suggestions (acceptance/revision in manuscript/rejection) received from reviewers are conveyed to the corresponding author. If a manuscript requires revision, the corresponding author is requested to provide a point-by-point response to reviewers' comments in the provided template (comment file) that can be downloaded from the website and submit a revised version of the manuscript. Page numbers and line numbers must be inserted in the revised manuscript to mention the required information in the last column of the comment file. In addition, all changes in the revised manuscript must be highlighted in yellow. This process is repeated until reviewers and editors are satisfied with the responses. The time from submission to acceptance will be around two to three months. The issue for publication of an accepted manuscript will be decided by the Editorial Team according to the topics of all accepted manuscripts awaiting publication. Manuscripts accepted for publication are copy edited for grammar, punctuation, print style, and format. All proofs are sent to the corresponding author. The corresponding author is expected to return the corrected proofs within the recommended timeframe. It will not be possible to incorporate corrections received after that period. The whole process of submission of the manuscript to final decision and sending and receiving proofs is completed through E-mail: ebiozjournal@gmail.com.

Submission of Manuscripts

All manuscripts must be submitted through the E-mail: ebiozjournal@gmail.com. Submission and publication will be free. There will be no submission or publication fee.

If you experience any problems in sending the files, please contact the editorial office by above-mentioned e-mail.

Manuscripts that are not submitted as per the requirements of the Journal will be returned to the authors for technical modifications, before they undergo editorial/ peer-review. The manuscript should be submitted in the form of two separate files as mentioned below and figures if any must be submitted as separate clear images as jpeg files with high resolution.

Links for templates and outlines to submit original and review articles are available at the end of this document.

[1] Title Page/First Page File/covering letter:
This file should provide:

  1. A cover letter addressed to the Editor-in-Chief. The letter should have a statement that the manuscript has been read and approved by all the authors, that the requirements for authorship have been met, and that each author believes that the manuscript represents honest work;
  2. The type of manuscript (original research article, review article, Brief Report, Short Communication, Letter to editor, etc.) title of the manuscript, running title, names of all authors/ contributors (with their designation and affiliations) and name(s) of department(s) and/ or institution(s) to which the work should be credited. All information which can reveal your identity should be here. Use word document files. Do not zip the files;
  3. The total number of pages, and word counts separately for abstract and for the text (excluding the references, tables and abstract), word counts for introduction + discussion in case of an original article;
  4. Disclose whether Artificial Intelligence (AI) assisted technologies (such as Large Language Models [LLMs], chatbots, or image creators) was used in the production of the manuscript. Authors who used such technology should describe how they used it.
  5. Source(s) of support in the form of grants, equipment, or both of these;
  6. Acknowledgement, if any. One or more statements should specify 1) contributions that need acknowledging but do not justify authorship, such as general support by a departmental chair;2) acknowledgments of technical help; and3) acknowledgments of financial and material support, which should specify the nature of the support. This should be included in the title page of the manuscript and not in the main article file.
  7. If the manuscript was presented as part at a meeting, the organization, place, and exact date on which it was read. A full statement to the editor about all submissions and previous reports that might be regarded as redundant publication of the same or very similar work. Any such work should be referred to specifically, and referenced in the new paper. Copies of such material should be included with the submitted paper, to help the editor decide how to handle the matter;
  8. Conflicts of Interest of each author/ contributor. A statement of financial or other relationships that might lead to a conflict of interest, if that information is not included in the manuscript itself or in an authors' form;
  9. Criteria for inclusion in the authors'/ contributors' list;
  10. A statement mentioning that the authors will not withdraw the manuscript after receiving the comments of the reviewers and proper justification will be provided for reviewers’ comments that could not be addressed in the revised manuscript.
  11. A statement that the manuscript has been read and approved by all the authors, that the requirements for authorship as stated earlier in this document have been met, and that each author believes that the manuscript represents honest work; and
  12. The name, address, e-mail, and mobile telephone number of the corresponding author, who is responsible for communicating with the other authors about revisions and final approval of the proofs.



[2] Blinded Article file:

The manuscript must not contain any mention of the authors' names or initials or the institution at which the study was done or acknowledgements. Page headers/running title can include the title but not the authors' names. Manuscripts not in compliance with The Journal's blinding policy will be returned to the corresponding author. The main text of the article, beginning from Abstract till References (including tables) should be in this file. Use word document file. Do not zip the files. Do not incorporate images in the file. The pages should be numbered consecutively, beginning with the first page of the blinded article file.

[3] Images:

Submit good quality colour images. Each image should be less than 4 MB in size. Size of the image can be reduced by decreasing the actual height and width of the images (keep up to 1800 x 1200 pixels or 5-6 inches). Images must be submitted by email as jpeg files along with the manuscript submission. Do not zip the files. Legends for the figures/images should be included at the end of the article file.

[4] The contributors' / copyright transfer form must be transferred in the form available on the website. The names of all authors must be entered in the same order as it should appear in the published manuscript and all authors must sign in the provided space.

Preparation of Manuscripts

The uniform requirements and specific requirement of EBIOZ are summarized below. Before submitting a manuscript, contributors are requested to check for the latest instructions available on our website (https://www.e-bioz.com).

EBIOZ accepts manuscripts written in Vancouver Style in British English with 12 font size in Times New Roman font with margins of 2.5 cm from all four sides. Page numbers must be included at the bottom of the pages.

Types of Manuscripts

Original articles:

The text of original articles amounting to up to 3000 words (excluding Abstracts, references and Tables) with the title of the manuscript should be divided into sections with the headings Abstract (structured in less than 250 words), Key-words (four to six), Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results, Discussion, References, Tables and Figure legends. Sub-headings are not allowed in an original article. It should be written in separate paragraphs under the appropriate titles mentioned above. The maximum number of tables and figures allowed for an original study is six (either six tables or six figures or a mixture of both not exceeding six).

Introduction: State the purpose and summarize the rationale for the study or observation.

Materials and Methods: It should include and describe the following aspects:

Ethics:
When reporting experiments on animals, indicate whether the institution's or a national research council's guide for, or any national law on the care and use of laboratory animals was followed.

Evidence for approval by a local Ethics Committee (for both human as well as animal studies) must be supplied by the authors. Animal experimental procedures should be as humane as possible and the details of anaesthetics and analgesics used should be clearly stated. The journal will not consider any paper which is ethically unacceptable. A statement on ethical practices and ethics committee/Institutional Review Board (IRB) permission with IRB approval number and date of approval must be included in all research articles at the beginning of the 'Materials and Methods' section.

Study design:
Selection and Description of Participants:
Describe your selection of the observational or experimental participants (laboratory animals, including controls) clearly, including eligibility and exclusion criteria and a description of the source population. Technical information: Identify the methods, apparatus (give the manufacturer's name and address in parentheses), and procedures in sufficient detail to allow other workers to reproduce the results. Give references to established methods, including statistical methods (see below); provide references and brief descriptions for methods that have been published but are not well known; describe new or substantially modified methods, give reasons for using them, and evaluate their limitations. Identify precisely all drugs and chemicals used, including generic name(s), dose(s), and route(s) of administration.

Statistics:
Whenever possible quantify findings and present them with appropriate indicators of measurement error or uncertainty (such as confidence intervals). Authors should report losses to observation (such as, dropouts from a clinical trial). When data are summarized in the Results section, specify the statistical methods used to analyse them. Avoid non-technical uses of technical terms in statistics, such as 'random' (which implies a randomizing device), 'normal', 'significant', 'correlations', and 'sample'. Define statistical terms, abbreviations, and most symbols. Specify the computer software used. Use upper italics (P 0.048). For all P values include the exact value and not less than 0.05 or 0.001. Mean differences in continuous variables, proportions in categorical variables and relative risks including odds ratios and hazard ratios should be accompanied by their confidence intervals.

Results:
Present your results in a logical sequence in the text, tables, and illustrations, giving the main or most important findings first. Do not repeat in the text all the data in the tables or illustrations; emphasize or summarize only important observations. Extra- or supplementary materials and technical detail can be placed in an appendix where it will be accessible but will not interrupt the flow of the text; alternatively, it can be published only in the electronic version of the journal.

When data are summarized in the Results section, give numeric results not only as derivatives (for example, percentages) but also as the absolute numbers from which the derivatives were calculated, and specify the statistical methods used to analyse them. Restrict tables and figures to those needed to explain the argument of the paper and to assess its support. Use graphs as an alternative to tables with many entries; do not duplicate data in graphs and tables. Where scientifically appropriate, analyses of the data by variables such as age and sex should be included.

Discussion:
Include summary of key findings (primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, results as they relate to a prior hypothesis); Strengths and limitations of the study (study question, study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation); Interpretation and implications in the context of the totality of evidence (is there a systematic review to refer to, if not, could one be reasonably done here and now?, what this study adds to the available evidence, effects on patient care and health policy, possible mechanisms); Limitations of the study must be mentioned here as the last paragraph.

Do not repeat in detail data or other material given in the Introduction or the Results section. In particular, contributors should avoid making statements on economic benefits and costs unless their manuscript includes economic data and analyses. Avoid claiming priority and alluding to work that has not been completed. New hypotheses may be stated if needed, however they should be clearly labelled as such.

Conclusion:
Controversies raised by this study; and Future research directions (for this particular research collaboration, underlying mechanisms, clinical research) and recommendations. About 30 references can be included. These articles generally should not have more than six authors.

Review Articles:

It is expected that review articles must be general or systematic reviews and would be written by individuals who have done substantial work on the subject or are considered experts in the field. A short summary of the work done by the contributor(s) in the field of review should accompany the manuscript.

The prescribed word count is up to 3000 words excluding tables, references and abstract. The manuscript may have about 90 references. The manuscript should have unstructured Abstracts (250 words) representing an accurate summary of the article. The section titles would depend upon the topic reviewed. Authors submitting review article should include a section describing the methods used for locating, selecting, extracting, and synthesizing data. These methods should also be summarized in both abstracts. The maximum number of tables and figures allowed for a review article is six (either six tables or six figures or a mixture of both not exceeding six).

The journal expects the contributors to give post-publication updates on the subject of review. The update should be brief, covering the advances in the field after the publication of the article and should be sent as a letter to editor, as and when major development occurs in the field.

Letter to the Editor:

These should be short and decisive observations. They should preferably be related to articles previously published in the Journal or views expressed in the journal. They should not be preliminary observations that need a later paper for validation. The letter could have up to 500 words and 5 references. It could be generally authored by not more than four authors.

Others:

Editorial, Guest Editorial, Brief reports, and Short Communication are solicited by the Editorial Board.

References:

References should be numbered consecutively in the order in which they are first mentioned in the text (not in alphabetic order). Identify references in text, tables, and legends by Arabic numerals in superscript with square bracket after the punctuation marks. References cited only in tables or figure legends should be numbered in accordance with the sequence established by the first identification in the text of the particular table or figure. Use the style of the examples below, which are based on the formats used by the NLM in Index Medicus. The titles of journals should be abbreviated according to the style used in Index Medicus. Use complete name of the journal for non-indexed journals. References to papers accepted but not yet published should be designated as “in press”. Information from manuscripts submitted but not accepted should be cited in the text as “unpublished observations” with written permission from the source. Avoid using abstracts as references. Avoid citing a "personal communication" unless it provides essential information not available from a public source, in which case the name of the person and date of communication should be cited in parentheses in the text.

Authorship Criteria

Authorship credit should be based only on substantial contributions to each of the three components mentioned below:

          1. Concept and design of study or acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data;
          2. Drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; and
          3. Final approval of the version to be published.

Participation solely in the acquisition of funding or the collection of data does not justify authorship. General supervision of the research group is not sufficient for authorship. Each contributor should have participated sufficiently in the work to take public responsibility for appropriate portions of the content of the manuscript. The order of naming the contributors should be based on the relative contribution of the contributor towards the study and writing the manuscript. Once submitted the order cannot be changed without written consent of all the contributors.

Although the Journal does not specify a maximum number of authors, if requested, the authors should provide a justification if the number of authors exceed 6 for original articles, 4 for short communications/brief reports and 2 for letters to editor.

Artificial intelligence (AI) assisted technology

The authors must disclose whether they used Artificial Intelligence (AI) assisted technologies (such as Large Language Models [LLMs], chatbots, or image creators) in the production of submitted work. Authors who use such technology should describe, in both the cover letter and the submitted work in the appropriate section if applicable, how they used it. For example, if AI was used for writing assistance, describe this in the acknowledgment section. If AI was used for data collection, analysis, or figure generation, authors should describe this use in the methods. Chatbots (such as ChatGPT) should not be listed as authors because they cannot be responsible for the accuracy, integrity, and originality of the work, and these responsibilities are required for authorship. Therefore, humans are responsible for any submitted material that included the use of AI-assisted technologies. Authors should carefully review and edit the result because AI can generate authoritative-sounding output that can be incorrect, incomplete, or biased. Authors should not list AI and AI-assisted technologies as an author or co-author, nor cite AI as an author. Authors should be able to assert that there is no plagiarism in their paper, including in text and images produced by the AI. Humans must ensure there is appropriate attribution of all quoted material, including full citations.

Articles in Journals

  1. Standard journal article (for up to six authors): Shukla N, Husain N, Agarwal GG, Husain M. Utility of cysticercus fasciolaris antigen in Dot ELISA for the diagnosis of neurocysticercosis. Indian J Med Sci 2008;62:222-7.
  2. Standard journal article (for more than six authors): List the first six contributors followed by et al. Nozari Y, Hashemlu A, Hatmi ZN, Sheikhvatan M, Iravani A, Bazdar A, et al. Outcome of coronary artery bypass grafting in patients without major risk factors and patients with at least one major risk factor for coronary artery disease. Indian J Med Sci 2007;61:547-54
  3. Volume with supplement: Shen HM, Zhang QF. Risk assessment of nickel carcinogenicity and occupational lung cancer. Environ Health Perspect 1994; 102 Suppl 1:275-82.
  4. Issue with supplement: Payne DK, Sullivan MD, Massie MJ. Women's psychological reactions to breast cancer. Semin Oncol 1996; 23(1, Suppl 2):89-97.

Books and Other Monographs

a. Personal author(s): Ringsven MK, Bond D. Gerontology and leadership skills for nurses. 2nd ed. Albany (NY): Delmar Publishers; 1996.
b. Editor(s), compiler(s) as author: Norman IJ, Redfern SJ, editors. Mental health care for elderly people. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1996.
c. Chapter in a book: Phillips SJ, Whisnant JP. Hypertension and stroke. In: Laragh JH, Brenner BM, editors. Hypertension: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. 2nd ed. New York: Raven Press; 1995. pp. 465-78. Electronic Sources as reference.


Journal article on the Internet
Abood S. Quality improvement initiative in nursing homes: the ANA acts in an advisory role. Am J Nurs [serial on the Internet]. 2002 Jun [cited 2002 Aug 12];102(6):[about 3 p.]. Available from: http://www.nursingworld.org/AJN/2002/june/Wawatch.htm

Monograph on the Internet
Foley KM, Gelband H, editors. Improving palliative care for cancer [monograph on the Internet]. Washington: National Academy Press; 2001 [cited 2002 Jul 9]. Available from: http://www.nap.edu/books/0309074029/html/.

Homepage/Web site
Cancer-Pain.org [homepage on the Internet]. New York: Association of Cancer Online Resources, Inc.; c2000-01 [updated 2002 May 16; cited 2002 Jul 9]. Available from: http://www.cancer-pain.org/.

Part of a homepage/Web site
American Medical Association [homepage on the Internet]. Chicago: The Association; c1995-2002 [updated 2001 Aug 23; cited 2002 Aug 12]. AMA Office of Group Practice Liaison; [about 2 screens]. Available from: http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/category/1736.html

Tables

Tables should be self-explanatory and should not duplicate textual material.
Tables with more than 10 columns and 25 rows are not acceptable.
Number tables, in Arabic numerals, consecutively in the order of their first citation in the text and supply a brief title for each.
Place explanatory matter in footnotes, not in the heading.
Explain in footnotes all non-standard abbreviations that are used in each table.
Obtain permission for all fully borrowed, adapted, and modified tables and provide a credit line in the footnote.
For footnotes use the alphabets in lower case in sequence from “a” to “z” in superscript.
Tables with their legends should be provided at the end of the text after the references. The tables along with their number should be cited at the relevant        place in the text

Illustrations (Figures)

Provide the images in JPEG format with high resolution. The file size should be within 4 MB in size.
Figures should be numbered consecutively according to the order in which they have been first cited in the text.
Labels, numbers, and symbols should be clear and of uniform size. The lettering for figures should be large enough to be legible after    reduction to fit the width of a printed column.
Symbols, arrows, or letters used in photomicrographs should contrast with the background and should be marked neatly with transfer      type or by tissue overlay and not by pen.
Titles and detailed explanations belong in the legends for illustrations not on the illustrations themselves.
The figures should be trimmed to remove all the unwanted areas.
If a figure has been published elsewhere, acknowledge the original source and submit written permission from the copyright holder to    reproduce the material. A credit line should appear in the legend for such figures.
Legends for illustrations: Type or print out legends (maximum 40 words, excluding the credit line) for illustrations using double              spacing, with Arabic numerals corresponding to the illustrations. When symbols, arrows, numbers, or letters are used to identify parts    of the illustrations, identify and explain each one in the legend. Explain the internal scale (magnification) and identify the method of        staining in photomicrographs.
The Journal reserves the right to crop, rotate, reduce, or enlarge the photographs to an acceptable size.

Sending a revised manuscript

The revised version of the manuscript should be e-mailed in a manner like that used for submission of the manuscript for the first time. However, there is no need to submit the “First Page" or “Covering Letter" file while submitting a revised version. When submitting a revised manuscript, contributors are requested to highlight the changes in yellow in the manuscript. Authors should note that they cannot withdraw the manuscript after receiving the comments of the reviewers to revise the manuscript. Page and line numbers must be inserted in the revised manuscript.

Comment file (itemized list of changes made in the revised manuscript) that is available on the website must be downloaded and provided as per our requirements. The page numbers and line numbers where the changes have been incorporated must be mentioned in the last column of the comment file. In addition, all changes in the revised manuscript must be highlighted in yellow to identify the changes.

Proofs

Final galley proofs will be sent to the corresponding authors by email approximately 2 weeks before the publication date. The issues are published in the first week of January and July every year.

Manuscript submission, processing and publication charges

There will be no submission or publication charges.

Acceptance or rejection

Manuscripts are judged on the interest and importance of the topic, intellectual and scientific strength, clarity of presentation and relevance to EBIOZ readers. Among the other factors considered is the strength of the paper compared with that of other papers under review.

Manuscripts are processed for peer review only after receiving the copyright transfer from all co-authors. Authors cannot withdraw a manuscript after receipt of the reviewers' comments. Such manuscripts must be revised as per comments of the reviewers (or justify the comments that are not acceptable by the authors) and must be emailed, which, will be then published in EBIOZ if all comments of reviewers have been addressed and copyright of the manuscript has been transferred to EBIOZ. If such manuscripts are published in another Journal during this period without our consent, authors will be subjected to Indian and international copyright laws and all authors of that manuscript will be blacklisted in EBIOZ.

Corrections in a published article

Minor scientific errors in a published article are allowed if it’s inevitable. It will be corrected by inserting an “Erratum” in the next issue after its publication provided the author notifies the error to the Editorial Office by email immediately after publication of the manuscript. Erratum will be inserted after the approval of the Editor-in-Chief and only in the following issue after its publication. Late requests will not be allowed.

© 2025 Journal of Experimental Biology and Zoological Studies - Published by UNIZOA.